Compare
Synq vs WorkOS.
Both speak OIDC. Both ship enterprise SSO. WorkOS leans pure-enterprise (SAML, SCIM, Directory Sync). Synq leans modern-B2B (consumer providers, web3, brand-tier tenancy, AI agents) and pairs cleanly with WorkOS when you need SCIM.
Feature by feature
| Feature | WorkOS | Synq |
|---|---|---|
| Google / Microsoft / Apple OIDC | ||
| BYO OAuth credentials | ||
| SCIM provisioning | ||
| SAML federation | ||
| Discord / X / Telegram / Matrica | ||
| Solana wallet sign-in | ||
| Device flow (RFC 8628) | ||
| Per-Brand isolation (one Org, many Brands) | Per tenant | |
| Audit log + plan-tier retention | ||
| React + Next + RN + Solana Mobile SDKs | Partial | |
| llms.txt for AI coding agents |
When to pick which
The deciding factors
Pick WorkOS if
Your buyer is the enterprise security team and your blocker is SCIM provisioning or pure-SAML federation. WorkOS is the strongest answer to "we need to provision users from Okta via SCIM" today.
Pick Synq if
You want enterprise SSO PLUS consumer methods (Telegram, Discord, X, Matrica) PLUS web3 (Solana SIWS, multi-wallet) PLUS the agent-era device flow — all in one provider on top of a real OIDC issuer.
Run both if you have to.
WorkOS for SAML / SCIM, Synq for the OIDC authorization layer. Both speak the spec — they coexist cleanly.