Compare
Synq vs Auth0.
Auth0 is the deepest enterprise OIDC provider in the market. Synq is the modern alternative for teams that want a multi-Brand tenancy model, consumer + web3 providers Auth0 does not ship, and a simpler Dashboard.
Feature by feature
| Feature | Auth0 | Synq |
|---|---|---|
| Google / Microsoft / Apple OIDC | ||
| BYO OAuth credentials | ||
| SAML federation | ||
| SCIM provisioning | ||
| Rules / Actions in the auth flow | Webhooks + backend | |
| Telegram / Matrica / Solana SIWS | ||
| Multi-wallet linking per user | ||
| Device flow on every plan tier | Enterprise | |
| Per-Brand isolation (one Org, many Brands) | Per tenant | |
| React + Next + RN + Solana Mobile SDKs | Partial | |
| llms.txt for AI coding agents |
When to pick which
The deciding factors
Pick Auth0 if
You need the deepest enterprise B2B feature set in the market — Rules + Actions for in-flow logic, SCIM, SAML, decades of legacy provider compatibility. Auth0 is unmatched there.
Pick Synq if
You want a modern multi-Brand tenancy model, consumer + web3 providers (Telegram, Matrica, Solana), agent-era flows (device flow on every plan), and a simpler Dashboard than Auth0’s.
Already on Auth0?.
The migration guide maps the Auth0 model onto Synq one-to-one. Most teams ship in two sprints.