Compare
Synq vs Dynamic.
Dynamic is the multi-chain wallet-connector platform — focused on getting users connected from any chain into your dApp. Synq is the identity platform — Solana sign-in plus every other method behind a real OIDC issuer.
Feature by feature
| Feature | Dynamic | Synq |
|---|---|---|
| Sign-In With Solana | ||
| Multi-chain wallet support | Solana today | |
| Multi-wallet linking per user | ||
| Google / Microsoft / Apple OIDC | Limited | |
| BYO OAuth credentials per Brand | ||
| Telegram / Matrica first-class | Some | |
| Per-Brand isolation (one Org, many Brands) | ||
| Standards-compliant OIDC issuer | ||
| Audit log + plan-tier retention | Limited | |
| Device flow for AI agents / CLIs |
When to pick which
The deciding factors
Pick Dynamic if
Multi-chain coverage (EVM + Solana + others) is your primary requirement and you treat the wallet as the user, not as one connection on a larger profile. Dynamic’s strength is breadth across chains.
Pick Synq if
You ship on Solana (today; EVM is roadmap) and want wallet sign-in PLUS every other method (Google, Apple, Telegram, Matrica, X, Discord) PLUS multi-Brand tenancy PLUS a real OIDC issuer — all on one plane.
On Solana?.
Synq pairs wallet sign-in with enterprise OIDC and consumer providers on the same plane. Real OIDC, no SDK lock-in.